Research Integrity

The primary goal of science is to "get it right," meaning that scientists seek to accurately document the world as it is. While erroneous conclusions and flawed theories can and do occur, they can only be tolerated as long as reliable mechanisms of self-correction exist, but an array of recent evidence suggests that this is not always the case. This book offers a behavioral science perspective on how scientific practice becomes compromisedand provides recommendations for improvement. Broadening the discussion of research integrity beyond replication, publication biases, statistics, and methods, this book addresses the full complexity ofthe issue and serves academics and policy makers concerned with the reliability and validity of scientific findings across the social sciences. It tackles challenges presented by published reports and textbooks, addresses the ways that institutional review boards (IRBs) can influence the course of research, and discusses the weaknesses of meta-analysis, which is often recommended as a possible corrective measure for suboptimal scientific practice. The book concludes with an organizing frameworkto investigate how scientists' behaviors can impact the reliability and validity of scientific research.

Lee Jussim is a Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University, where he was Chair of the department from 2010-2013. He is the author of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, which received the 2013 Publisher's Prose Award for best book in Psychology.Jon A. Krosnick is the Frederic O. Glover Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences, Communication, Political Science, and Psychology at Stanford University. He is a social psychologist who does research on attitude formation, change, political behavior, and survey research methods. He also directs the Political Psychology Research Group.Sean T. Stevens is a Senior Research Fellow for Polling and Analytics at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). He is a social psychologist who researches the psychological foundations of self-censorship, what motivates the desire to censor others, and how moral convictions produce motivated reasoning that can distort interpretations of research in the social sciences.

The primary goal of science is to "get it right," meaning that scientists seek to accurately document the world as it is. While erroneous conclusions and flawed theories can and do occur, they can only be tolerated as long as reliable mechanisms of self-correction exist, but an array of recent evidence suggests that this is not always the case. This book offers a behavioral science perspective on how scientific practice becomes compromised and provides recommendations for improvement. Broadening the discussion of research integrity beyond replication, publication biases, statistics, and methods, this book addresses the full complexity of the issue and serves academics and policy makers concerned with the reliability and validity of scientific findings across the social sciences. It tackles challenges presented by published reports andtextbooks, addresses the ways that institutional review boards (IRBs) can influence the course of research, and discusses the weaknesses of meta-analysis, which is often recommended as a possible corrective measure for suboptimal scientific practice. The book concludes with an organizing frameworkto investigate how scientists' behaviors can impact the reliability and validity of scientific research.

This item is eligible for free returns within 30 days of delivery. See our returns policy for further details.